<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Is Not Pornographic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beijingcream.com/2012/03/this-is-not-pornographic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beijingcream.com/2012/03/this-is-not-pornographic/</link>
	<description>A Dollop of China</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 17:42:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabio</title>
		<link>http://beijingcream.com/2012/03/this-is-not-pornographic/#comment-10043</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fabio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 21:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beijingcream.com/?p=1699#comment-10043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Craig, I love the photo you used, Roger and his man bags, LOL.My comment suodns harsher than what I meant it to be, but as a Roddick fan I could not help but notice the striking similarities between the two matches I mentioned, and the completely different fan/media reaction afterwards. Different expectations for different players I guess. But those people who used to laugh at Roddick&#039;s failings vs Federer, saying he&#039;s a clown and not good enough to beat the great Roger, what are they saying now? Perhaps now they finally understand what it means for their guy to be stymied by someone else who will likely go down in history as being one of the greatest players ever. Federer losing in three consecutive slam finals to Nadal on clay doesn&#039;t mean he&#039;s a clown and can&#039;t play tennis, it just makes him unlucky to be living in the Nadal era. Finally, now they know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, I love the photo you used, Roger and his man bags, LOL.My comment suodns harsher than what I meant it to be, but as a Roddick fan I could not help but notice the striking similarities between the two matches I mentioned, and the completely different fan/media reaction afterwards. Different expectations for different players I guess. But those people who used to laugh at Roddick&#8217;s failings vs Federer, saying he&#8217;s a clown and not good enough to beat the great Roger, what are they saying now? Perhaps now they finally understand what it means for their guy to be stymied by someone else who will likely go down in history as being one of the greatest players ever. Federer losing in three consecutive slam finals to Nadal on clay doesn&#8217;t mean he&#8217;s a clown and can&#8217;t play tennis, it just makes him unlucky to be living in the Nadal era. Finally, now they know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Yishus: Am I Really Beauty? Beijing Cream</title>
		<link>http://beijingcream.com/2012/03/this-is-not-pornographic/#comment-2341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; Yishus: Am I Really Beauty? Beijing Cream]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beijingcream.com/?p=1699#comment-2341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the “I Am Beauty” sculptures that appeared recently on this site: I suppose I should just be happy to see a public monument to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the “I Am Beauty” sculptures that appeared recently on this site: I suppose I should just be happy to see a public monument to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
