<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top-of-the-Week Links: Stories about Tibet, resistance against reform, and Chelsea&#8217;s Frank Lampard coming to China?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beijingcream.com/2012/11/top-of-the-week-links-tibet-resistance-against-reform-lampard-to-china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beijingcream.com/2012/11/top-of-the-week-links-tibet-resistance-against-reform-lampard-to-china/</link>
	<description>A Dollop of China</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 17:42:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: melektaus</title>
		<link>http://beijingcream.com/2012/11/top-of-the-week-links-tibet-resistance-against-reform-lampard-to-china/#comment-170619</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[melektaus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beijingcream.com/?p=6200#comment-170619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From what I understand of these self-immolations, result mainly from complaints that the Dalai Lama is not inside Tibet. China does not have an obligation to make the Dalai return. That&#039;s a mutual agreement they much reach together with the DL and his representatives. Both sides must agree to the terms. I believe that the Chinese side has been reasonable and the Dalai Lama&#039;s side has not so far.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I understand of these self-immolations, result mainly from complaints that the Dalai Lama is not inside Tibet. China does not have an obligation to make the Dalai return. That&#8217;s a mutual agreement they much reach together with the DL and his representatives. Both sides must agree to the terms. I believe that the Chinese side has been reasonable and the Dalai Lama&#8217;s side has not so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
