Comments on: Mitch Moxley: My Troll And Me

By: Chinese Netizen

Chinese Netizen — Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:27:56 +0000

“Sanli-toon”
“I’ll never be like *that* guy”

By: Teresa's teesa

Teresa's teesa — Fri, 14 Jun 2013 08:01:00 +0000

Oh it all makes sense now! Must be that scumbag Jake Cooke of Web Presence in China!

Ha ha! Now it becomes clear. Is he still pulling his scams?

By: Jake the Muss!

Jake the Muss! — Fri, 14 Jun 2013 07:27:09 +0000

Just watched the three shots video with this guy. Oh my. What a sanctimonious little prick he is!

By: RhZ

RhZ — Fri, 14 Jun 2013 04:46:46 +0000

Wow that’s the first non-misogynistic comment I have seen from you so far on this site, Jake. Infantile of course, but at least not openly douche this time, that’s an improvement.

I would really avoid using my real name when posting these kinds of crap comments.

By: The noodles

The noodles — Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:12:02 +0000

And what do you look like, Jake? Shall we post your pick?

By: Jonathan Whittingham

Jonathan Whittingham — Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:56:20 +0000

Ultimately, at least we all agree that Poxley looks like a smarmy smug bastard wankstain

By: Vladimir Nabokov

Vladimir Nabokov — Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:14:33 +0000

One evening at a remote provincial college through which I happened to be jogging on a protracted lecture tour, I suggested a little quiz—ten definitions of a reader, and from these ten the students had to choose four definitions that would combine to make a good reader. I have mislaid the list, but as far as I remember the definitions went something like this. Select four answers to the question what should a reader be to be a good reader:

1. The reader should belong to a book club.
2. The reader should identify himself or herself with the hero or heroine.
3. The reader should concentrate on the social-economic angle.
4. The reader should prefer a story with action and dialogue to one with none.
5. The reader should have seen the book in a movie.
6. The reader should be a budding author.
7. The reader should have imagination.
8. The reader should have memory.
9. The reader should have a dictionary.
10. The reader should have some artistic sense.

The students leaned heavily on emotional identification, action, and the social-economic or historical angle. Of course, as you have guessed, the good reader is one who has imagination, memory, a dictionary, and some artistic sense–which sense I propose to develop in myself and in others whenever I have the chance.

By: Johnson

Johnson — Thu, 13 Jun 2013 04:02:58 +0000

I’ll wager 5 to 1 odds you come back and say something even dumber than the stuff you’ve said already.

By: King Baeksu

King Baeksu — Thu, 13 Jun 2013 04:00:04 +0000

Like the word “over,” you evidently don’t understand the meaning of “just,” either. Figures.

Toodle-oo!

By: Johnson

Johnson — Thu, 13 Jun 2013 03:39:10 +0000

Ha ha
Fuck, what a hypocrite. You started the name calling by calling me “dick” non stop. you really are a pathetic person. As for your “critics backing up opinions” nonsense, you’ve failed miserably at it, so find a new vocation to which you’re more suited…. like welfare.

By: King Baeksu

King Baeksu — Thu, 13 Jun 2013 03:26:15 +0000

“See, it’s this kind of stupid targeting of other writers that makes you a target for abuse.”

But that’s what critics do: They pass aesthetic judgement and back it up with argument and evidence. They don’t just name-call, which is your sole m.o. as far as I can tell.

Now run along and enjoy your bland, flavorless AP stories. Your CPU can’t seem to handle much more than that.

By: Johnson

Johnson — Thu, 13 Jun 2013 03:08:14 +0000

See, it’s this kind of stupid targeting of other writers that makes you a target for abuse. You’re a shit writer and you shit on people who are far better writers than you are. Then you make up your own rules and try to pretend they are valid.

That’s why we mock you so, Scott.

By: Johnson

Johnson — Thu, 13 Jun 2013 03:05:37 +0000

And he’s back again.

By: King Baeksu

King Baeksu — Thu, 13 Jun 2013 02:40:21 +0000

Oh, and while we’re on the subject of quality writing, I’d like to introduce everyone to Anna Hartford of Cape Town, South Africa:

http://nplusonemag.com/ponte-city

“Rent a White Guy,” a mere trifle in comparison to the above piece, caught on mostly because Mitch Moxley got lucky and was in the right place at the right time (doubt he even came up with the ultraclickable title himself). But luck doesn’t make one a great writer, which Hartford clearly is. I expect we’ll be hearing much more from her in the future.

By: King Baeksu

King Baeksu — Thu, 13 Jun 2013 02:05:05 +0000

“Fo the last time, you dolt the issue isn’t hiding sources, the issue is how much work it takes to do so and the fact it can’t just be easily done.”

Bob —> Fred.

Yep, you’re right. Too difficult to manage. My bad.

BTW, I don’t post under alternate IDs. I’m not a cowardly wimp with a little-used mangina like you are. I actually stand by what I say, and am man enough to do it in public. Been doing so for over twenty years, in fact.