Comments on: New York Times: China Has Been Unhelpful In MH370 Search [UPDATE] http://beijingcream.com/2014/04/new-york-times-china-has-been-unhelpful-in-mh370-search/ A Dollop of China Tue, 22 Jan 2019 17:42:34 +0000 hourly 1 By: Owen http://beijingcream.com/2014/04/new-york-times-china-has-been-unhelpful-in-mh370-search/#comment-267485 Wed, 16 Apr 2014 02:16:57 +0000 http://beijingcream.com/?p=23916#comment-267485 You know what, I have no idea where these “analysis” came from. China did research job and released these satellite images as Austrlia and France, and both countries’s pictures were proved not related to MH370. How did this become unhelpful?

]]> By: Seriously http://beijingcream.com/2014/04/new-york-times-china-has-been-unhelpful-in-mh370-search/#comment-267472 Tue, 15 Apr 2014 23:51:31 +0000 http://beijingcream.com/?p=23916#comment-267472 Those very helpful countries should have found the plane weeks ago, haven’t they? This article shows how ignorant and cold-blooded some reporters can be.

]]> By: DSLAM http://beijingcream.com/2014/04/new-york-times-china-has-been-unhelpful-in-mh370-search/#comment-267420 Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:55:25 +0000 http://beijingcream.com/?p=23916#comment-267420 Yeah I’m not getting where you are coming from on this one Anthony. It seems like a pretty straightforward article to me.
“You can hear Kingston and a lot of others silently seething, can’t you?” Uhh, no I can’t
“There’s a lot of prestige on the line here drips with sarcasm, even if it might not be intended that way.”
No, I don’t sense any sarcasm and it is certainly not “dripping” with it. And if you think he may not be intending it that way, then it would be even more non-sarcastic.

Perhaps read it again tomorrow, sometimes a second reading lends itself to a different light.

]]> By: Chinese Netizen http://beijingcream.com/2014/04/new-york-times-china-has-been-unhelpful-in-mh370-search/#comment-267360 Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:04:57 +0000 http://beijingcream.com/?p=23916#comment-267360 Actually I could not get the feeling of seething that you want us to see, as you did. Thought the article was pretty much correct, as an analysis.

]]>