People’s Daily Op-Ed Resorts To Plagiarism To Cast Stones At The New York Times’s Past Plagiarism

Venerable titans of journalism, People’s Daily, published an attack piece on the New York Times yesterday (in Chinese) accusing the Gray Lady of deteriorating standards and bad breath. “In recent years, there has been an explosion in plagiarism and fabrication by its journalists,” PD writes, highlighting two particular debacles involving infamous plagiarists Jayson Blair and Zachery Kouwe.

Financial Times noticed something very odd about PD’s words, however. Very odd and very ironic:

Apart from the obvious irony in the fact that the People’s Daily is trying to pass judgment about reporting standards, there is another, even more basic problem with its criticism of the Times: its words appear to have been almost entirely plagiarised.

Sentences were lifted these sources (via Financial Times again):

Of course, China News Agency is basically Xinhua — which shares a bit more than words with People’s Daily — and PD’s editors probably think it’s okay to plagiarize oneself (they have a point… in this country, it is okay, judging by industry standards).

But isn’t this such a lovely reminder that when it comes to journalism, some practitioners are clueless? You knew that already, of course, and if not, go read some of TAR Nation’s columns. Yet we are equally reminded that media doesn’t serve the same purpose in China as it does in “free” societies. The People’s Daily op-ed, after all, was written exclusively for a Chinese audience, the kind that will not know it is plagiarized, and will take at face value the revelation that the New York Times has sinned in the past. So have your laugh at People’s Daily; then weep for those who find no reason to.

UPDATE, 11:02 am: Some more highlights of the PD piece, via AFP:

In a column posted on the People’s Daily website, the paper’s former international news editor Ren Yujun noted that Mark Thompson, the former BBC director general and next chief executive of the Times, was being “challenged” amid a sex scandal involving the late BBC host Jimmy Savile.

Yesterday, Ren wrote another article headlined, “The New York Times’ reputation tarnished by scandals in recent years”, recalling episodes including the probe of former Times reporter Jayson Blair, who fabricated and plagiarised dozens of reports.


“There are always some voices in the world that do not want to see China develop and become stronger, and they will try any means to smear China and Chinese leaders and try to sow instability in China,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said. “Your scheme is doomed to failure.”

“Doomed to failure” will be a meme.

    5 Responses to “People’s Daily Op-Ed Resorts To Plagiarism To Cast Stones At The New York Times’s Past Plagiarism”

    1. MAC

      This is such classic Chinese journalism. No, scratch that- it’s classic China. I especially love the part where there is no mention about exactly why the credibility of the Times is suddenly an issue.

    2. King Baeksu

      The Jayson Blair affair happened in 2003, nearly a decade ago. They really are scraping the bottom of the barrel, aren’t they? But let’s give that one to them, anyway, along with the Zachery Kouwe incident, which happened in 2010.

      So: Two cases in the past decade? How does that constitute an “explosion” in plagiarism and fabrication by the NYT exactly?

      It doesn’t, which is why their own statement is pure fabrication, of course.

    3. Chinese Netizen

      “Some practioners are clueless”

      No s**t! It took a Lao wai a years worth of uncovering information that is publicly accessible in china to string together that Wen baobao is a Daddy Warbucks zillionaire!

      Now I know that Chinese “reporters” don’t go there if they want a future in china but what’s really scary is seeing now what the CCP thugs are going to do to roll back that sort of info that was previously researchable! Goodbye sunshine!

    4. D

      The Copyright Law of the People’s Republic of China has specific exemptions declaring copyright to be null and void in matters of newsworthiness.

      That makes it hard to argue that People’s Daily has committed ‘wrongful appropriation’ or violated any actual law. For its purposes, this was all cherry picked from some nebulous public domain.

      Within the context of journalism, the whole reason people harp on plagiarism is that it is somehow more honest to attribute the source of these words (arguable) and that being so forthcoming is an essential part of a media outlet’s integrity and credibility.

      Since People’s Daily has neither intergrity nor credibility, I’d say it’s safe.


    Leave a Reply

    • (will not be published)

    XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    one × = 2